Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
Date: Fri Jan 26 2001 - 11:28:37 EST


Jamie Lokier wrote:
>
> Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> > First, you are ignoring a TCP_RST, which means "stop trying".
>
> That's why we stop when we receive the second TCP RST.
> It's just like dropping due to congestion, which is of course perfectly
> safe in moderation.
>

No, you can't issue multiple connects in response to a single socket
option. One can argue that it would have been OK for these firewalls to
drop ECN packets, but replying with RST is just too broken to live.

        -hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 21:00:25 EST