Re: Version 2.4.1 cannot be built.

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Tue Jan 30 2001 - 17:13:17 EST

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN)"
Previous message: Tobias Ringstrom: "WOL and 3c59x (3c905c-tx)"
In reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "Version 2.4.1 cannot be built."
Next in thread: Brett G. Person: "Reiserfs problem was: Re: Version 2.4.1 cannot be built."
Reply: Brett G. Person: "Reiserfs problem was: Re: Version 2.4.1 cannot be built."
Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Version 2.4.1 cannot be built."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:

> The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.

It worked fine here, with 2.4.1 unpacked from the tarball.

Rik

-- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN)"
Previous message: Tobias Ringstrom: "WOL and 3c59x (3c905c-tx)"
In reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "Version 2.4.1 cannot be built."
Next in thread: Brett G. Person: "Reiserfs problem was: Re: Version 2.4.1 cannot be built."
Reply: Brett G. Person: "Reiserfs problem was: Re: Version 2.4.1 cannot be built."
Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Version 2.4.1 cannot be built."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 21:00:36 EST