On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
> The code was broken, so I disabled it.
Because of the loss of state bug with Cyclone, and the "missing" acpi_wake
workaround, right?
> I "fixed" WOL in the 2.2.19-pre candidate driver. It's
> at http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/3c59x.c-2.2.19-pre6-1.gz
>
> I'd really appreciate it if you could test the WOL in
> that driver. Then we can port it into 2.4 and try to
> fool Linus into thinking it's a bugfix :)
Of course it is a bug-fix! I'm very bugged by the current behaviour!
Doesn't that count? :-)
Ugh. Is the 2.2 driver more advanced than the 2.4 one? Only temporary, I
hope... :-)
But alas, I cannot easily test this patch, since I need 2.4 for my ATA100
IDE controller, but please send me a patch for 2.4 as soon as you have
one, and I'll help you test it.
Would it be enough to port the acpi_wake function to 2.4? If so, I can do
that myself. In fact, I think I'll try that right away. Who needs
breakfast anyway? :-)
/Tobias, the one smiley per sentence guy :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 21:00:38 EST