On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Now one could say: just let the networkers use their own kind of buffers
> > (and that's exactly what is done in the zerocopy patches), but that again leds
> > to inefficient buffer passing and ungeneric IO handling.
[snip]
> It is quite possible that the right thing to do is to do
> conversions in the cases it happens.
OTOH, somehow a zero-copy system which converts the zero-copy
metadata every time the buffer is handed to another subsystem
just doesn't sound right ...
(well, maybe it _is_, but it looks quite inefficient at first
glance)
regards,
Rik
-- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 07 2001 - 21:00:13 EST