Re: [kernel] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.2: cure the kapm-idled taking (100-epsilon)% CPU time

From: Philipp Rumpf (prumpf@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Sat Mar 03 2001 - 18:28:22 EST

Next message: Kevin Buhr: "Re: RFC: changing precision control setting in initial FPU context"
Previous message: Olaf Hering: "2.4.3-pre1 md_autodetect_dev unresolved"
In reply to: Francis Galiegue: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.2: cure the kapm-idled taking (100-epsilon)% CPU time"
Next in thread: Francis Galiegue: "Re: [kernel] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.2: cure the kapm-idled taking (100-epsilon)% CPU time"
Reply: Francis Galiegue: "Re: [kernel] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.2: cure the kapm-idled taking (100-epsilon)% CPU time"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 12:19:07AM +0100, Francis Galiegue wrote:
> Well, from reading the source, I don't see how this can break APM... What am I
> missing?

apm_bios_call must not be called with two identical pointers for
two different registers.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Kevin Buhr: "Re: RFC: changing precision control setting in initial FPU context"
Previous message: Olaf Hering: "2.4.3-pre1 md_autodetect_dev unresolved"
In reply to: Francis Galiegue: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.2: cure the kapm-idled taking (100-epsilon)% CPU time"
Next in thread: Francis Galiegue: "Re: [kernel] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.2: cure the kapm-idled taking (100-epsilon)% CPU time"
Reply: Francis Galiegue: "Re: [kernel] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.2: cure the kapm-idled taking (100-epsilon)% CPU time"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 07 2001 - 21:00:15 EST