Re: (struct dentry *)->vfsmnt;

From: Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Date: Wed Mar 14 2001 - 13:11:05 EST


On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote:

> The AIX vgimport will not corrupt /etc/fstab with duplicate mounts, nor for
> that matter with duplicate LV names (AIX has a single namespace for all LVs).
> If a conflict is found with an LV name, a new name like "lv01" is used (the
> LV names are not that important anyways). I'm not sure what would
> happen with a duplicate mount point (whether it would pick a new name, or
> simply leave it out of /etc/fstab), but it isn't too hard to think of
> easy ways to fix this (e.g. /home01 or /mnt/vgname/home or whatever).

[snip the rest of description]

Excuse me, but doesn't it scream "userland"? IOW, is there any reason to
do that in the kernel? If you want to spread /etc/fstab all over the
place storing bits in relevant filesystems - fine, you even don't
need to bother with superblocks. Just teach mount(8) to put the
mountpoint into /.last.mounted and be done with that...

        It's a policy question - if somebody wants to play with such
schemes he can do it in the place where policy stuff belongs.
I.e. in userland. Since the reading side contains a bunch of heuristics
(obviously depending on the local naming policy for temp. mountpoints,
for one thing) you don't need anything special on the writing side...

                                                        Cheers,
                                                                Al

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 15 2001 - 21:00:16 EST