Re: scsi_scan problem.

From: Doug Ledford (dledford@redhat.com)
Date: Thu Mar 15 2001 - 00:19:15 EST

Next message: James Simmons: "Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [RFC] fbdev & power management"
Previous message: Bob Frey: "Re: scsi_scan problem."
In reply to: Bob Frey: "Re: scsi_scan problem."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Bob Frey wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 09:35:43PM -0500, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > 16384 LUNs for Fibre Channel. As you see, scanning is out of the
> > question. You must issue REPORT LUNs and fall back on scanning
> > if the device reports a check condition. I did that when I worked
> Why wait for a check condition? There's an INQUIRY field bit that
> indicates whether REPORT LUNs is supported.

And I'm all for using it in the 2.5 kernel SCSI stack ;-)

Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> http://people.redhat.com/dledford Please check my web site for aic7xxx updates/answers before e-mailing me about problems - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: James Simmons: "Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [RFC] fbdev & power management"
Previous message: Bob Frey: "Re: scsi_scan problem."
In reply to: Bob Frey: "Re: scsi_scan problem."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 15 2001 - 21:00:17 EST