> I've implemented a patch for util-linux-2.11a
> which adds LABEL support to mkswap(8) and swapon/swapoff(8).
Yes, maybe a reasonable idea.
But I would prefer a somewhat more ambitious approach.
My first thought was: why label individual swap partitions?
I almost never want to distinguish swap partitions, and just do
"swapon -a". In case one wants to guard against changing device names,
why not add an option -A so that "swapon -A" does swapon on each
partition with a swap signature?
However, that would greatly increase the risk that exists already
today: someone has a swap partition, and does mkfs.foo, and
it so happens that foofs does not use the sector with the swapsignature.
Now this foofs partition has a swap signature, but we would be very
unhappy if it were used as swap space.
The real problem is that our disks usually do not have a volume label.
Outside of all file systems.
The "signatures" that we rely on today are located in different places,
so that a filesystem can have several valid signatures at the same time.
And we first know where to look when we know the type already.
Design a Linux partition table format, where a partition descriptor
has fields start, end, fstype, fslabel, and the whole disk has a vollabel.
Put it in sector 0-N for an all-Linux disk, and in sectors pointed at
by a classical DOS-type partition table entry when the disk is shared.
(Maybe I already did that once - it sounds so familiar now that I write
this. Then why was it not pursued? Maybe LVM already does these things?)
Andries
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 15 2001 - 21:00:19 EST