On Friday, March 16, 2001 01:03:20 AM -0500 Alexander Viro
<viro@math.psu.edu> wrote:
>> Ok, I was more talking about the ugliness that is reiserfs_panic (how
>> many times do we need a commented out for(;;)?). For panic() calling
>> sys_sync, I think there non-filesystem related panics where we do want
>> to sync.
>
> panic doesn't sync if called from interrupt (thanks $DEITY).
> It is pointless to sync during boot.
> sync from driver panic is not better than one from fs.
>
> What does it leave? I hadn't checked each panic(), but it seems that
> if we ever want syncing upon panic() it's safer to do sys_sync() by
> hands before calling panic(). If it is actually ever needed, that is.
>
>
A quick grep -r shows over 700 panic callers (outside reiserfs). Most look
like init messages, or things that generally happen during interrupts.
But, I think there are too many to assume that nobody could benefit from a
sync.
Does that mean they _need_ the sync? Probably not.
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:08 EST