Re: [CHECKER] 16 potential locking bugs in 2.4.1

From: Neil Brown (neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au)
Date: Tue Mar 20 2001 - 00:33:17 EST


On Friday March 16, acc@CS.Stanford.EDU wrote:
> Here are some more results from the MC project. These are 16 errors found
> in 2.4.1 related to inconsistent use of locks. As usual, if you can
> verify any of these or show that they are false positives, please let us
> know by CC'ing mc@cs.stanford.edu.
>
> -Andy Chou
>
> | fs/nfsd/vfs.c | nfsd_link |
> | fs/nfsd/vfs.c | nfsd_symlink |

These are not actually bugs. The usage of fh_lock is fairly obscure.
The unlock gets done by an fh_put which the caller does after calling
nfsd_link or nfs_symlink.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:13 EST