Re: VIA vt82c686b and UDMA(100)

From: Nils Philippsen (nils@fht-esslingen.de)
Date: Thu Mar 22 2001 - 08:29:18 EST

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: 2.2.18: e100.c (SuSE 7.1): udelay() used in a wrong way?"
Previous message: Holger Lubitz: "Re: UDMA 100 / PIIX4 question"
In reply to: Brian Dushaw: "Re: VIA vt82c686b and UDMA(100)"
Next in thread: Brian Dushaw: "Re: VIA vt82c686b and UDMA(100)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Brian Dushaw wrote:

> And for the record:
>
> "hdparm -d1 -t -X69 /dev/hda" gives:

My current hdparm line looks like this:

hdparm -m16 -c1 -u1 -k1 -X69 /dev/...

With this, I can get 28.x MB/s instead of 15.y with just -X69.

Nils

-- Nils Philippsen / Berliner Straße 39 / D-71229 Leonberg // +49.7152.209647 nils@wombat.dialup.fht-esslingen.de / nils@fht-esslingen.de / nils@redhat.de The use of COBOL cripples the mind; its teaching should, therefore, be regarded as a criminal offence. -- Edsger W. Dijkstra

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: 2.2.18: e100.c (SuSE 7.1): udelay() used in a wrong way?"
Previous message: Holger Lubitz: "Re: UDMA 100 / PIIX4 question"
In reply to: Brian Dushaw: "Re: VIA vt82c686b and UDMA(100)"
Next in thread: Brian Dushaw: "Re: VIA vt82c686b and UDMA(100)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:17 EST