Stephen Clouse wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 12:47:27PM +0100, Guest section DW wrote:
> > Last week I installed SuSE 7.1 somewhere.
> > During the install: "VM: killing process rpm",
> > leaving the installer rather confused.
> > (An empty machine, 256MB, 144MB swap, I think 2.2.18.)
> >
> > Last month I had a computer algebra process running for a week.
> > Killed. But this computation was the only task this machine had.
> > Its sole reason of existence.
> > Too bad - zero information out of a week's computation.
> > (I think 2.4.0.)
> >
> > Clearly, Linux cannot be reliable if any process can be killed
> > at any moment. I am not happy at all with my recent experiences.
>
> Really the whole oom_kill process seems bass-ackwards to me. I can't in my mind
> logically justify annihilating large-VM processes that have been running for
> days or weeks instead of just returning ENOMEM to a process that just started
> up.
>
> We run Oracle on a development box here, and it's always the first to get the
> axe (non-root process using 70-80 MB VM). Whenever someone's testing decides to
> run away with memory, I usually spend the rest of the day getting intimate with
> the backup files, since SIGKILLing random Oracle processes, as you might have
> guessed, has a tendency to rape the entire database.
>
> It would be nice to give immunity to certain uids, or better yet, just turn the
> damn thing off entirely. I've already hacked that in...errr, out.
AMEN! TO THIS!
Uptime of a process is a much better mesaure for a killing candidate
then it's size.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:19 EST