Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Thu Mar 22 2001 - 20:37:09 EST

Next message: Tim Wright: "Re: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86"
Previous message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: [linux-lvm] EXT2-fs panic (device lvm(58,0)):"
In reply to: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
Next in thread: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
Reply: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Martin Dalecki wrote:

> This is due to the broken calculation formula in oom_kill().

Feel free to write better-working code.

Rik

-- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tim Wright: "Re: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86"
Previous message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: [linux-lvm] EXT2-fs panic (device lvm(58,0)):"
In reply to: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
Next in thread: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
Reply: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:19 EST