Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init

From: Martin Dalecki (dalecki@evision-ventures.com)
Date: Fri Mar 23 2001 - 05:48:57 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [CHECKER] 4 warnings in kernel/module.c"
Previous message: christophe barbe: "Re: eepro100 question: why SCBCmd byte is 0x80?"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Martin Dalecki wrote:
>
> > This is due to the broken calculation formula in oom_kill().
>
> Feel free to write better-working code.

I don't get paid for it and I'm not idling through my days...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [CHECKER] 4 warnings in kernel/module.c"
Previous message: christophe barbe: "Re: eepro100 question: why SCBCmd byte is 0x80?"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:20 EST