Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init

• Next message: David Brownell: "PATCHES: usb with CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG (using new pci_pool API)"
• Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] Fix races in 2.4.2-ac22 SysV shared memory"
• In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
• Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
• Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

> I'd like to have it there as an option. As to the default - You
> would have to see how much applications assume they can overcommit
> and rely on it. You might find you need a few Gbytes of swap just to
> boot

Seems a bit exaggeration ;) Here are numbers,

        http://lists.openresources.com/NetBSD/tech-userlevel/msg00722.html

6-50% more VM and the performance hit also isn't so bad as it's thought
(Eduardo Horvath sent a non-overcommit patch for Linux about one year
ago).

        Szaka

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: David Brownell: "PATCHES: usb with CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG (using new pci_pool API)"
• Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] Fix races in 2.4.2-ac22 SysV shared memory"
• In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
• Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
• Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:21 EST