On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 02:54:55AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote:
> > - trying to kill a task that is permanently in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
> > will probably deadlock the machine [or the random OOM killer will
> > kill the box].
>
> This could indeed be a problem, though I cannot really see any
> case where a task would be in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE permanently.
I've seen this with 'mt rewind' jamming on ide-tape. I'm
not sure of the exact pathology , but ISTR that it
was related issuing that command while the hardware was busy.
In any case the point is that a badly written driver or faulty
h/w even in a subsiduary system can cause this.
In an ideal world of course these wouldn't happen, but OTOH
is this an issue in failing a box which is going to fail
anyway if we don't kill the process. If we could ensure
a graceful failure so much the better.
TTFN
-- Roger Think of the mess on the carpet. Sensible people do all their demon-summoning in the garage, which you can just hose down afterwards. -- damerell@chiark.greenend.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 31 2001 - 21:00:15 EST