Re: RFC: configuring net interfaces

From: Francois Romieu (romieu@cogenit.fr)
Date: Thu Mar 29 2001 - 04:25:47 EST


Krzysztof Halasa <khc@intrepid.pm.waw.pl> écrit :
[...]
> That's a physical interface like V.35 or RS232.

Ok.

[...]
> > * n200, t200 ?
>
> What's that?

Parameters for retransmission of a trame specified in Q922. t200 is the
timeout value and n200 the maximal number of retransmissions. They can
be negocied and default to t200=1,5s, n200=3.

> > Do we put the crc type here ?
>
> I don't think so. Frame Relay uses only standard CRC. Correct me if I'm
> wrong.

Ok.

[...]
> > While we're here, could we agree on the notion of raw hdlc, i.e. :
> > - no address, no command. crc present (ARPHRD_RAWHDLC ?);
> > - no address, no command, no crc (ARPHRD_PATHOLOGICHDLC ?).
>
> Do we really need another ARPHRD for that?
> BTW: What protocol(s) use such CRC-less HDLC?

No protocol I know. Sometime one just want to verify how a driver performs
when he receives badly fscked data. One can live without it.

-- 
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 31 2001 - 21:00:20 EST