('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)
>>>>> "BS" == BERECZ Szabolcs <szabi@inf.elte.hu> writes:
BS> ... a setiathome running at nice level 19, and a bladeenc at
BS> nice level 0. setiathome uses 14 percent, and bladeenc uses
BS> 84 percent of the processor. I think, setiathome should use
BS> max 2-3 percent. the 14 percent is way too much for me.
BS> ...
BS> with kernel 2.2.16 it worked for me.
BS> now I use 2.4.2-ac20
Would it the case that bladeenc running on 2.4.2 spends more
time doing I/O? I am not saying that the userland makes more I/O
requests, but if the same set of I/O requests are taking longer
to complete on 2.4.2, then while bladeenc is waiting for their
completion, it is not so surprising that the other process uses
the otherwise-idle CPU cycles.
------------------------------------------------------------
--== Sent via Deja.com ==--
http://www.deja.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 07 2001 - 21:00:10 EST