Oliver Xymoron wrote:
>
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, David Lang wrote:
> > > if we want to get the .config as part of the report then we need to make
> > > it part of the kernel in some standard way (the old /proc/config flamewar)
> > > it's difficult enough sometimes for the sysadmin of a box to know what
> > > kernel is running on it, let alone a bug reporting script.
> >
> > Let's hope it's not a flamewar, but here goes :)
> >
> > We -need- .config, but /proc/config seems like pure bloat.
>
> As a former proponent of /proc/config (I wrote one of the much-debated
> patches), I tend to agree. Debian's make-kpkg does the right thing, namely
> treating .config the same way it treats System-map, putting it in the
> package and eventually installing it in /boot/config-x.y.z. If Redhat's
> kernel-install script did the same it would rapidly become a non-issue.
How about /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build/.config ? It's already there.
Tom
-- The Daemons lurk and are dumb. -- Emerson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 07 2001 - 21:00:10 EST