Re: [Ext2-devel] ext2 inode size (on-disk)

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Thu Apr 19 2001 - 15:29:52 EST

Next message: Arjan Filius: "Re: [linux-lvm] 2.4.3-ac{6,7} LVM hang"
Previous message: Ulrich Drepper: "Re: light weight user level semaphores"
In reply to: tytso@valinux.com: "Re: [Ext2-devel] ext2 inode size (on-disk)"
Next in thread: Theodore Tso: "Re: [Ext2-devel] ext2 inode size (on-disk)"
Reply: Theodore Tso: "Re: [Ext2-devel] ext2 inode size (on-disk)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

tytso@valinux.com wrote:
> In the long run, it probably makes sense to adjust the algorithms to
> allow for non-power-of-two inode sizes,

If you don't mind, does that imply packing inodes across block
boundaries?

Regards,

Jeff

-- 
Jeff Garzik       | "The universe is like a safe to which there is a
Building 1024     |  combination -- but the combination is locked up
MandrakeSoft      |  in the safe."    -- Peter DeVries
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Arjan Filius: "Re: [linux-lvm] 2.4.3-ac{6,7} LVM hang"
Previous message: Ulrich Drepper: "Re: light weight user level semaphores"
In reply to: tytso@valinux.com: "Re: [Ext2-devel] ext2 inode size (on-disk)"
Next in thread: Theodore Tso: "Re: [Ext2-devel] ext2 inode size (on-disk)"
Reply: Theodore Tso: "Re: [Ext2-devel] ext2 inode size (on-disk)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 23 2001 - 21:00:33 EST