Re: Has the iptables security patch been vetted?

From: Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Date: Tue Apr 24 2001 - 00:09:47 EST

Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] pedantic code cleanup - am I wasting my time with this?"
Previous message: Tom Leete: "Re: [Semi-OT] Dual Athlon support in kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In message <20010423204825.H26083@vnl.com> you write:
> I'm sure you've run across this one:
>
> http://netfilter.samba.org/security-fix/
>
> I'd like to know how official this patch is, ie how
> well checked out?

Hi Dale,

The preferred patch is available, and has been tested (several
new testsuite tests now exist) and submitted to Linus (et. al):

        http://netfilter.filewatcher.org/security-fix/ftp-security2.patch
        http://netfilter.samba.org/security-fix/ftp-security2.patch
        http://netfilter.gnumonks.org/security-fix/ftp-security2.patch

Hope that helps,
Rusty.

--
Premature optmztion is rt of all evl. --DK
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] pedantic code cleanup - am I wasting my time with this?"
Previous message: Tom Leete: "Re: [Semi-OT] Dual Athlon support in kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:00:10 EST