On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Padraig Brady wrote:
> for a partition. If I understand correctly ramfs just points
> to the file data which are pages in the cache marked not to be
It does not even do that - as of 2.4, the VFS in the kernel also knows how
to cache a filestructure itself. It's in the dentry-cache. So ramfs just
provides the thin mapping between VFS operations and the VFS caches
(dentries, inodes, pages) like any other 2.4 filesystem - with the
difference that ramfs does not need to know anything about actually
transferring the cache entries to a backing store (a physical filesystem).
Take a look at fs/ramfs/inode.c, it's just some hundred odd lines of
code and worth reading to find out more about how 2.4's VFS works.
> uncached. Doh! is ramfs supported in 2.2?
Don't think so, for the above reason.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:00:18 EST