Re: Zerocopy implementation issues

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Sun Apr 29 2001 - 06:18:41 EST


On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 04:06:16AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> I understand that you are frustruated about this and it
> requires you to touch some delicate assembly. But I'm
> going to be blunt and say "tough", because everyone has
> to implement this correctly. Just do it and get it
> over with.

I'm doing it _NOW_, but I'm having to rotate the checksum
at the end if dst & 1, only to have it unrotated in an
inefficient manner in csum_block_*. Seems a bit of a
waste of CPU cycles.

--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:00:22 EST