Re: unsigned long ioremap()?

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Thu May 03 2001 - 03:44:46 EST

Next message: Ingo Oeser: "Re: Why recovering from broken configs is too hard"
Previous message: Abramo Bagnara: "Re: unsigned long ioremap()?"
In reply to: Abramo Bagnara: "Re: unsigned long ioremap()?"
Next in thread: Abramo Bagnara: "Re: unsigned long ioremap()?"
Reply: Abramo Bagnara: "Re: unsigned long ioremap()?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Abramo Bagnara wrote:
> > > That's indeed the reason to change ioremap prototype for 2.5.
> >
> > Say what??
> >
>
> Please give a look
> http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0008.1/0338.html
> http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0008.1/0407.html
>
> This was something that already got a wide consent.

Let's not return unsigned long -- DaveM's suggestion is far better.
unsigned long is not opaque enough, IMHO.

-- 
Jeff Garzik      | Game called on account of naked chick
Building 1024    |
MandrakeSoft     |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ingo Oeser: "Re: Why recovering from broken configs is too hard"
Previous message: Abramo Bagnara: "Re: unsigned long ioremap()?"
In reply to: Abramo Bagnara: "Re: unsigned long ioremap()?"
Next in thread: Abramo Bagnara: "Re: unsigned long ioremap()?"
Reply: Abramo Bagnara: "Re: unsigned long ioremap()?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 07 2001 - 21:00:15 EST