Re: NEWBEE "reverse ioctl" or someting like

From: volodya@mindspring.com
Date: Thu May 03 2001 - 09:54:59 EST


a) just make your management app periodically issue
  ioctl(fd, GET_CONFIG_INFO, ...)
and make the driver return -1 when the info is not present

b) make a new device and open it with management app

c) make a new node in /proc and open it with management app
  (cons: requires /proc to be mounted)

d) kernel-user netlink socket (never tried myself)

                     Vladimir Dergachev

On Thu, 3 May 2001, [ISO-8859-1] sébastien person wrote:

> hi,
>
> I've made a network driver wich is attached to the serial port.
> The network hardware is able to return information to the pc. theses
> informations are belong to the configuration of the hardware. I
> succeed on receive information in the driver but I've no idea to alert
> higher process (like configuration app ...) that I've received something
> (wich is not network data like TCP or ARP etc ...).
>
> I think that use of pipe isn't preconised because I must fork process
> to use pipe, I search something like ioctl but in the other way :
>
> kernel process ---> user process
>
> Is somebody know the best and easy way ??
>
> thank (I hope this is the right place to ask)
>
> sebastien person
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 07 2001 - 21:00:16 EST