Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt safe

• Next message: dean gaudet: "Re: [Question] Explanation of zero-copy networking"
• Previous message: Wilfried Weissmann: "HPT370 raid hack"
• In reply to: Brian Gerst: "Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt safe"
• Next in thread: Nigel Gamble: "Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt safe"
• Reply: Nigel Gamble: "Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt safe"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 7 May 2001, Brian Gerst wrote:
>
> This patch will still cause the user process to seg fault: The error
> code on the stack will not match the address in %cr2.

You've convinced me. Good thinking. Let's do the irq thing.

                Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: dean gaudet: "Re: [Question] Explanation of zero-copy networking"
• Previous message: Wilfried Weissmann: "HPT370 raid hack"
• In reply to: Brian Gerst: "Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt safe"
• Next in thread: Nigel Gamble: "Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt safe"
• Reply: Nigel Gamble: "Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt safe"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 07 2001 - 21:00:25 EST