On 05/10, Matthias Andree rearranged the electrons to read:
> On Wed, 09 May 2001, Mart?n Marqu?s wrote:
>
> > There has also been lots of talks about reiserfs being the cause of
> > some data lose and performance lose (not sure about this last one).
>
> I never experienced ReiserFS data loss, but I did experience read
> performance loss over ext2fs and switched that file system back to ext2.
> The ReiserFS people could not reproduce the problem, so I'm not sure
> what was the actual cause.
>
> ext3fs has never given me any problems, but I did not have it in
> production use where I discovered major ReiserFS <-> kNFSd
> incompatibilities. ext3 has a 0.0.x version number which suggests it's
> not meant for production use.
>
> XFS is claimed to work with NFS, but not currently availabe for Linux
> 2.4.4.
$ uname -r
2.4.4-ac5.xfs
$ uptime
9:20am up 1 day, 18:28, 4 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
-- Hob Goblin z3rk@ahkbarr.dynip.comA society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither. - Thomas Jefferson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 15 2001 - 21:00:23 EST