Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3
From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Fri May 11 2001 - 11:04:10 EST
- Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "x86 bootmem corruption"
- Previous message: null: "nasty SCSI performance drop-outs (potential test case)"
- In reply to: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3"
- Next in thread: Hans Reiser: "Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3"
- Reply: Hans Reiser: "Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3"
- Reply: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
> I think with the growing acceptance of ReiserFS in the Linux
> community, it is tiresome to have to apply a patch again and again
> just to get working NFS. 2.2 NFS horrors all over again.
The zero copy patches were basically self contained and tested for 6 months.
The reiserfs NFS hacks are ugly as hell and dont belong in the base kernel.
There is a difference.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "x86 bootmem corruption"
- Previous message: null: "nasty SCSI performance drop-outs (potential test case)"
- In reply to: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3"
- Next in thread: Hans Reiser: "Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3"
- Reply: Hans Reiser: "Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3"
- Reply: Gregory Maxwell: "Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Tue May 15 2001 - 21:00:26 EST