At 5:45 PM +0100 2001-05-13, Alan Cox wrote:
> > What I was arguing (conceptually) is that something like
>> #define ENOIOCTLCMD ENOTTY
>> or preferably but more invasively s/ENOIOCTLCMD/ENOTTY/ (mutatis mutandis)
>>
>> would result in no loss of function. I assert that ENOIOCTLCMD is
>> redundant, pending a specific counterexample.
>
>On the contrary. I can now no longer force an unsupported response when there
>is a generic routine I dont wish to use
That makes sense. Thanks.
-- /Jonathan Lundell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 15 2001 - 21:00:32 EST