Re: 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory

From: Brian Gerst (bgerst@didntduck.org)
Date: Mon May 14 2001 - 20:57:20 EST


"H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
>
> Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105142025000.18102-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
> By author: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > On Mon, 14 May 2001, Wayne Whitney wrote:
> > > In mailing-lists.linux-kernel, you wrote:
> > >
> > > > You need to compile highmem support into the kernel if you want to
> > > > use more than 890 MB of RAM, set it to maximum 4GB for best
> > > > performance...
> > >
> > > On a similar note, what is the maximum physical memory supported
> > > by the 4GB option?
> >
> > Ummm, 4GB maybe? ;)
> >
>
> It seems obvious once you know why the limits are there. The 1 GB
> limit (actually 1024-128 MB = 896 MB) is a software limit; the 4 GB
> and 64 GB limits are hardware limits and are exact.

Even with the 4GB and 64GB options, some physical address space has to
be reserved for memory mapped I/O.

--
					Brian Gerst
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 15 2001 - 21:00:38 EST