According to H. Peter Anvin:
> A device can inherently belong to multiple device classes, and it
> really should be thought of as such.
And then there are layering technologies like LVM and loopback.
They should be included in a discovery, but if you limit yourself
to one "device type", there's no place for them.
> For example a disk may belong, at the same time, to the "scsi",
> "disk" and "scsi-disk" device classes [...]
True, but in a sane system, "scsi" + "disk" implies "scsi-disk".
-- Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <firstname.lastname@example.org> "We have no fuel on board, plus or minus 8 kilograms." -- NEAR tech - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to email@example.com More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 15 2001 - 21:00:45 EST