"Albert D. Cahalan" wrote:
>
> H. Peter Anvin writes:
>
> > This would leave no way (without introducing new interfaces) to write,
> > for example, the boot block on an ext2 filesystem. Note that the
> > bootblock (defined as the first 1024 bytes) is not actually used by
> > the filesystem, although depending on the block size it may share a
> > block with the superblock (if blocksize > 1024).
>
> The lack of coherency would screw this up anyway, doesn't it?
> You have a block device, soon to be in the page cache, and
> a superblock, also soon to be in the page cache. LILO writes to
> the block device, while the ext2 driver updates the superblock.
> Whatever gets written out last wins, and the other is lost.
>
Albert, I *did* say "this better work or we have a problem."
-hpa
-- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 15 2001 - 21:00:46 EST