Hi Linus,
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Looks ok, but it also feels like 2.5.x stuff to me.
>
> Also, there's the question of whether to make ramfs just built-in,
> or make _tmpfs_ built in - ramfs is certainly simpler, but tmpfs
> does the same things and you need that one for shared mappings etc.
>
> Comments?
cr:/speicher/src/u4ac9 $ ls -l mm/shmem.o*
-rw-r--r-- 1 cr users 154652 Mai 16 19:27 mm/shmem.o-tmpfs
-rw-r--r-- 1 cr users 180764 Mai 16 19:24 mm/shmem.o+tmpfs
cr:/speicher/src/u4ac9 $ ls -l fs/ramfs/ramfs.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 cr users 141452 Mai 16 19:27 fs/ramfs/ramfs.o
So CONFIG_TMPFS adds 26k and ramfs 140k.
Greetings
Christoph
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 23 2001 - 21:00:18 EST