Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>:
> Being able to turn CML2 into CML1 might be the more useful exercise.
That's...not a completely crazy idea. Hmmm...
It might be possible to take a CML2 rulebase and generate a sort of stupid
jackleg CML1 translation of it. The resulting config.in would be huge
and nasty, and would only work in forward sequence with no side-effect
computation, but you just might be able to get the old tools to parse it.
Again there's a technical problem with derivations. Probably solvable.
But the real question is whether the old tools have enough value to be
worth the effort. What problem are you trying to solve here?
-- <a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it. -- John Adams, in a letter to Thomas Jefferson. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 23 2001 - 21:00:30 EST