On Fri, 25 May 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > So I think I'll buy some experimentation. That HIGHMEM change is
> > too ugly to live, though, I'd really like to hear more about why
> > something that ugly is necessary.
> If you mean the "GFP_BUFFER allocations should fail instead
> of looping forever" thing, it is because:
No, I was thinking more of the dirty buffer balancing thing.
It seems to have this hardcoded notion of "DMA + NORMAL", which is just
wrong. There could be more zones that are acceptable to buffers, so what
it _should_ do is to just walk the zone list that GFP_BUFFER points to.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 31 2001 - 21:00:26 EST