Re: [PATCH] net #6

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Date: Wed May 30 2001 - 17:24:37 EST


Hi!

> They are neccessary
>
> > @@ -643,9 +631,7 @@
> > eexp_hw_tx_pio(dev,data,length);
> > }
> > dev_kfree_skb(buf);
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lp->lock, flags);
> > -#endif
> > enable_irq(dev->irq);
> > return 0;
>
> They are done this way to get good non SMP performance. Your changes would
> ruin that.

Maybe macro "spin_lock_irqsave_on_smp()" would be good idea? These
ifdefs look ugly. Maybe local to driver, maybe even global.
                                                                Pavel

-- 
I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 31 2001 - 21:00:52 EST