On Tue, 29 May 2001, John Chris Wren wrote:
> In BSD, select() states that when a time out occurs,
> the bits passed to select will not be altered.
> In Linux, which claims BSD compliancy for this
> in the man page (but does not state either way
> what will happen to the bits), zeros the users bit masks
> when a timeout occurs.
(i) "In BSD" - which one did you look at? 4.2? 4.3? 4.4?
Details differ a bit.
(ii) The Linux man page only says
RETURN VALUE
On success, select and pselect return the number of
descriptors contained in the descriptor sets, which may be
zero if the timeout expires before anything interesting
happens. On error, -1 is returned, and errno is set
appropriately; the sets and timeout become undefined, so
do not rely on their contents after an error.
That is, a wise programmer does not assume any particular value
for the bits after a timeout.
> Should the man pages be changed to reflect reality,
They do reflect reality.
> or select() fixed to act like BSD?
No, select() is fine.
dean gaudet answered:
sounds like a man page bug.
Shame on him for noticing man page bugs without cc'ing
the man page maintainer! Fortunately however, I do not
think anything is wrong here. But just to be sure I added
a sentence to select.2:
On BSD, when a timeout occurs, the file descriptor bits are not changed.
Linux follows SUSv2 and sets the bit masks to zero upon a timeout.
Andries
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 07 2001 - 21:00:12 EST