Re: [PATCH] sym53c8xx timer and smp fixes

From: Gérard Roudier (groudier@club-internet.fr)
Date: Fri Jun 01 2001 - 12:18:38 EST


On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> Tim Hockin wrote:
> > spinlock_t sym53c8xx_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
> > +spinlock_t sym53c8xx_host_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
> > #define NCR_LOCK_DRIVER(flags) spin_lock_irqsave(&sym53c8xx_lock, flags)
> > #define NCR_UNLOCK_DRIVER(flags) spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sym53c8xx_lock,flags)
> > +#define NCR_LOCK_HOSTS(flags) spin_lock_irqsave(&sym53c8xx_host_lock, flags)
> > +#define NCR_UNLOCK_HOSTS(flags) spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sym53c8xx_host_lock,flags)
> >
> > #define NCR_INIT_LOCK_NCB(np) spin_lock_init(&np->smp_lock);
> > #define NCR_LOCK_NCB(np, flags) spin_lock_irqsave(&np->smp_lock, flags)
> > @@ -650,6 +655,8 @@
> >
> > #define NCR_LOCK_DRIVER(flags) do { save_flags(flags); cli(); } while (0)
> > #define NCR_UNLOCK_DRIVER(flags) do { restore_flags(flags); } while (0)
> > +#define NCR_LOCK_HOSTS(flags) do { save_flags(flags); cli(); } while (0)
> > +#define NCR_UNLOCK_HOSTS(flags) do { restore_flags(flags); } while (0)
> >
> > #define NCR_INIT_LOCK_NCB(np) do { } while (0)
> > #define NCR_LOCK_NCB(np, flags) do { save_flags(flags); cli(); } while (0)
> > @@ -695,7 +702,7 @@
>
> so, this driver is mixed spinlocks and save/restore_flags? Any chance
> this can be converted to all spinlocks?

This has been done years ago for linux 2.1.93.
The save/restore flags locking methods are conditionnaly compiled for
earlier kernels. This makes the corresponding code very probably quite
useless nowadays and I should remove it from the source.

  Gérard.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 07 2001 - 21:00:17 EST