Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac9

From: Keith Owens (kaos@ocs.com.au)
Date: Wed Jun 06 2001 - 00:25:51 EST


On Tue, 05 Jun 2001 21:55:39 -0700,
David Ford <david@blue-labs.org> wrote:
>Quite positive it's the right map file. I used -m and specified the
>exact file.
>
>Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>>David Ford wrote:
>>
>>> >>EIP; c01269f9 <proc_getdata+4d/154> <=====
>>>Trace; c01b1021 <read_eeprom+131/1a8>
>>
>>This trace looks corrupted to me... are you sure that System.map for the
>>crashed kernel matches -exactly- with the one ksymoops used to decode
>>this?

The trace definitely looks suspect, I cannot see any BUG() calls in
proc_getdata(), even looking at the object code.

Does
  objdump --start-address=0xc01269f9 --stop-address=0xc0126a10 vmlinux
show the same code bytes, starting with ud2a? I will be surprised if
it does. If it does not then you definitely have the wrong System.map
for the oops.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 07 2001 - 21:00:44 EST