-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 03:38:35PM -0600, Brian D Heaton wrote:
> Maybe i'm missing something. I just tried this (with the 262144k/1
> and 128k/2048 params) and my results are within .1s of each other. This is
> without any special patches. Am I doing something wrong????
Oh, I don't mean the time elapsed, It's that nothing _else_ can happen
while dd is hogging the kernel.
> Oh yes -
>
> SMP - dual PIII866/133
Yes, this is what you are doing wrong ;)
My hypothesis is that in your case, one cpu gets pegged copying pages
from /dev/zero into dd's buffer, while the other cpu can do things like
updating mouse cursors, run setiathome, etc.
What happens if you do *two* dd-tortures with huge buffers at the same
time? And then, please don't happen to have a quad box!
I don't know if my symptom (loss of interactivity on heavy writing) is
related to swapoff -a causing the same symptom on deeply-swapped boxes.
BTW keep in mind my 4-liner is based more on voodoo than on analysis.
Bernd Jendrissek
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7IICU/FmLrNfLpjMRAnpTAJ48/jAFxZqfxUf2NXT0O542KDbNOwCfaoZo
Q2xaNE4GBqnbn/cl2vrRxLc=
=4sGO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 15 2001 - 21:00:08 EST