Re: [patch] 2.4.6-pre3 unresolved symbol do_softirq

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Wed Jun 13 2001 - 09:06:42 EST

Next message: Keith Owens: "Re: [patch] 2.4.6-pre3 unresolved symbol do_softirq"
Previous message: Keith Owens: "Re: [patch] 2.4.6-pre3 unresolved symbol do_softirq"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Re: [patch] 2.4.6-pre3 unresolved symbol do_softirq"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: [patch] 2.4.6-pre3 unresolved symbol do_softirq"
Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: [patch] 2.4.6-pre3 unresolved symbol do_softirq"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Keith Owens writes:
> OTOH if any *.S code is compiled into a module then all symbols it
> refers to must be EXPORT_SYMBOL_NOVERS().

Why not just add --include modversions.h to the gcc command line to
build it, why wouldn't this work?

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Keith Owens: "Re: [patch] 2.4.6-pre3 unresolved symbol do_softirq"
Previous message: Keith Owens: "Re: [patch] 2.4.6-pre3 unresolved symbol do_softirq"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Re: [patch] 2.4.6-pre3 unresolved symbol do_softirq"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: [patch] 2.4.6-pre3 unresolved symbol do_softirq"
Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: [patch] 2.4.6-pre3 unresolved symbol do_softirq"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 15 2001 - 21:00:18 EST