Re: [patch] 2.4.6-pre3 unresolved symbol do_softirq

From: Keith Owens (kaos@ocs.com.au)
Date: Wed Jun 13 2001 - 09:11:57 EST


On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 07:06:42 -0700 (PDT),
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>Keith Owens writes:
> > OTOH if any *.S code is compiled into a module then all symbols it
> > refers to must be EXPORT_SYMBOL_NOVERS().
>
>Why not just add --include modversions.h to the gcc command line to
>build it, why wouldn't this work?

Assembler code is not hooked into the generic module symbol version
handling. Every .S rule is unique and I'm not going to change every
one.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 15 2001 - 21:00:18 EST