"David S. Miller" wrote:
> 1) Extending the type bus numbers use inside the kernel.
>
> Basically how most multi-controller platforms work now
> is they allocate bus numbers in the 256 bus space as
> controllers are probed. If we change the internal type
> used by the kernel to "u32" or whatever, we expand that
> available space accordingly.
>
> For the lazy, basically go into include/linux/pci.h
> and change the "unsigned char"s in struct pci_bus into
> some larger type. This is mindless work.
Why do you want to make the bus number larger than the PCI bus number
register?
It seems like adding 'unsigned int domain_num' makes more sense, and is
more correct. Maybe that implies fixing up other code to use a
(domain,bus) pair, but that's IMHO a much better change than totally
changing the interpretation of pci_bus::bus_number...
> 2) Figure out what to do wrt. sys_pciconfig_{read,write}()
3) (tiny issue) Change pci_dev::slot_name such that it includes the
domain number. This is passed to userspace by SCSI and net drivers as a
way to allow userspace to associate a kernel interface with a bus
device.
> Basically, this 256 bus limit in Linux is a complete fallacy.
yep
Regards,
Jeff
-- Jeff Garzik | Andre the Giant has a posse. Building 1024 | MandrakeSoft | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 15 2001 - 21:00:22 EST