Re: [BUG] 2.2.19 -> 80% Packet Loss

• Next message: Horst von Brand: "Re: obsolete code must die"
• Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "RE: SMP spin-locks"
• In reply to: Scott Laird: "Re: [BUG] 2.2.19 -> 80% Packet Loss"
• Next in thread: Scott Laird: "Re: [BUG] 2.2.19 -> 80% Packet Loss"
• Reply: Scott Laird: "Re: [BUG] 2.2.19 -> 80% Packet Loss"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> You can fix this by upping the socket buffer that ping asks for (look
> for setsockopt( ... SO_RCVBUF ...)) and then tuning the kernel to
> allow larger socket buffers. The file to fiddle with is
> /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_max.

Currently it is set to 65535. I doubled it several times and each time saw
no change when I sent it a ping flood with packet size 64590 or higher.
What sort of magnitude were you thinking?

> That doesn't really answer why you'd want to fling that many 64k-ish
> ping packets around, though.

No reason specifically other than intuition. Just kinda stumbled on to
this one.

-Chuck

-- 
Chuck Wolber
System Administrator
AltaServ Corporation
(425)576-1202
ten.vresatla@wkcuhc
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Horst von Brand: "Re: obsolete code must die"
• Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "RE: SMP spin-locks"
• In reply to: Scott Laird: "Re: [BUG] 2.2.19 -> 80% Packet Loss"
• Next in thread: Scott Laird: "Re: [BUG] 2.2.19 -> 80% Packet Loss"
• Reply: Scott Laird: "Re: [BUG] 2.2.19 -> 80% Packet Loss"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 15 2001 - 21:00:24 EST