Re: Should VLANs be devices or something else?

From: Dax Kelson (dkelson@gurulabs.com)
Date: Tue Jun 19 2001 - 17:52:27 EST

Next message: Gregory T. Norris: "[patch] rio500 devfs support"
Previous message: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: Alan Cox quote?"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: Should VLANs be devices or something else?"
Next in thread: Ben Greear: "Re: Should VLANs be devices or something else?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, David S. Miller wrote:

> Technical implementation level concerns need to be considered
> as well as "does it look nice".

Ok, let's hear the other side of the story.

What are the alternatives?

Dax

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Gregory T. Norris: "[patch] rio500 devfs support"
Previous message: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: Alan Cox quote?"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: Should VLANs be devices or something else?"
Next in thread: Ben Greear: "Re: Should VLANs be devices or something else?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 23 2001 - 21:00:26 EST