Re: [Vlan-devel] Should VLANs be devices or something else?

From: Matthias Welwarsky (matthias.welwarsky@frontsite.de)
Date: Fri Jun 22 2001 - 10:00:29 EST

Next message: Jonathan Lundell: "Re: mktime in include/linux"
Previous message: Christian Mudra: "2.4.5 kernel oops in inode.c:486"
In reply to: Ben Greear: "Re: [Vlan-devel] Should VLANs be devices or something else?"
Next in thread: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: [Vlan-devel] Should VLANs be devices or something else?"
Reply: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: [Vlan-devel] Should VLANs be devices or something else?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi all,

Can I use CBQ with VLans? It should be possible if they are devices, has
anybody tried this yet?

regards,
Matthias Welwarsky

-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Matthias Welwarsky mail: matthias.welwarsky@frontsite.de System Engineer

frontsite AG Gesellschaft für Informationstechnologie tel.: +49 6151 - 86 00 00 Gutenbergstraße 10 fax.: +49 6151 - 86 00 499 64331 Weiterstadt web: http://www.frontsite.de -----------------------------------------------------------------------

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jonathan Lundell: "Re: mktime in include/linux"
Previous message: Christian Mudra: "2.4.5 kernel oops in inode.c:486"
In reply to: Ben Greear: "Re: [Vlan-devel] Should VLANs be devices or something else?"
Next in thread: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: [Vlan-devel] Should VLANs be devices or something else?"
Reply: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: [Vlan-devel] Should VLANs be devices or something else?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 23 2001 - 21:00:39 EST