> Signals are a pretty dopey API anyway - so instead of trying to patch
> them up, why not think of something better for AIO?
I have to agree, in a way... At some point we need to swallow our pride,
admit that UNIX has a crappy event model, and implement something like Win32
GetMessage =)...
I've been having trouble finding situations where asynchronous signals are
really the most appropriate technique, aside from delivering
life-threatening things like SIGTERM, SIGKILL, and SIGSEGV. The mutation
into queued, information-carrying siginfo signals just shows how badly we
need a more robust event model... (what would truly kick butt is a unified
interface that could deliver everything from fd events to AIO completions to
semaphore/msgqueue events, etc, with explicit binding between event queues
and threads).
Regards,
Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 30 2001 - 21:00:19 EST