Re: RFC: Changes for PCI

From: Todd Inglett (tinglett@vnet.ibm.com)
Date: Thu Jun 28 2001 - 12:20:16 EST

Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: 2.4.5-ac20 five more undocumented symbols"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch."
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: RFC: Changes for PCI"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: RFC: Changes for PCI"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> 2.5 is right around the corner, and sysdata should handle PCI
> domains/segments just fine in 2.4.
>
> Why do we need to patch 2.4 at all right now? Since 2.5 is close I
> don't think it's a big deal saying "use 2.5+ for >256 physical buses"

I agree...and we can always maintain a 2.4 patch on the side to handle
the bus limit.

-- 
-todd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: 2.4.5-ac20 five more undocumented symbols"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch."
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: RFC: Changes for PCI"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: RFC: Changes for PCI"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 30 2001 - 21:00:19 EST