Re: all processes waiting in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Date: Fri Jun 29 2001 - 19:12:11 EST

Next message: Byeong-ryeol Kim: "Re: compile error about do_softirq in 2.4.5-ac21"
Previous message: Eric W. Biederman: "Results of playing with linux-lite...."
In reply to: Jeff Dike: "Re: all processes waiting in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state"
Next in thread: Jeff Dike: "Re: all processes waiting in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state"
Reply: Jeff Dike: "Re: all processes waiting in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Friday 29 June 2001 22:40, Jeff Dike wrote:
> The bug was UML-specific and specific in such a way that I don't think it's
> possible to find the bug in the native kernel by making analogies from the
> UML bug.

Heh, too bad, there goes that chance to show uml bagging a major kernel bug.
But it's just a matter of time...

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Byeong-ryeol Kim: "Re: compile error about do_softirq in 2.4.5-ac21"
Previous message: Eric W. Biederman: "Results of playing with linux-lite...."
In reply to: Jeff Dike: "Re: all processes waiting in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state"
Next in thread: Jeff Dike: "Re: all processes waiting in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state"
Reply: Jeff Dike: "Re: all processes waiting in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 30 2001 - 21:00:23 EST