Re: Machine check exception? (2.4.6+SMP+VIA)

• Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: VM in 2.4.7-pre hurts..."
• Previous message: Adam: "Re: recvfrom and sockaddr_in.sin_port"
• In reply to: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: Machine check exception? (2.4.6+SMP+VIA)"
• Next in thread: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: Machine check exception? (2.4.6+SMP+VIA)"
• Reply: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: Machine check exception? (2.4.6+SMP+VIA)"
• Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Machine check exception? (2.4.6+SMP+VIA)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Chris Wedgwood wrote:

> Actually you merged that with Linus a few revisions back iirc.
> I don't see it for K7/AMD:

> cw:tty5@tapu(kernel)$ grep machine_check\(struct\ pt bluesmoke.c
> static void intel_machine_check(struct pt_regs * regs, long error_code)

There is no K7 specific implementation. It's the same as the Intel MSRs.

>From the comment in the file:

        case X86_VENDOR_AMD:
            /*
             * AMD K7 machine check is Intel like
             */
            if(c->x86 == 6)
                intel_mcheck_init(c);
            break;

regards,

Dave.

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.suse.de/~davej
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: VM in 2.4.7-pre hurts..."
• Previous message: Adam: "Re: recvfrom and sockaddr_in.sin_port"
• In reply to: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: Machine check exception? (2.4.6+SMP+VIA)"
• Next in thread: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: Machine check exception? (2.4.6+SMP+VIA)"
• Reply: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: Machine check exception? (2.4.6+SMP+VIA)"
• Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Machine check exception? (2.4.6+SMP+VIA)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 15 2001 - 21:00:08 EST